Would you rather have a U.S. president who's a pacifist and only a reluctant hawk or a hawk who's only a reluctant pacifist? I'm afraid the U.S. has the latter. On the positive side, the cast opposing Bush II's policy on Iraq, even within his own party is growing. Slate reports that "Armey, Kissinger, Secretary of State Colin Powell, anonymous "senior administration officials," and the men who ran the State Department and National Security Council under Bush's father—who see no evidence of an Iraqi role in Sept. 11, no proof that Iraq is close to acquiring nuclear weapons, and no sense in jeopardizing the global war against terror by attacking Iraq against the will of our allies."